Žižek
Wrote The Ticklish Subject (1999), explicitly positions itself against Deconstructionists, Heideggerians, Habermasians, cognitive scientists, and what Žižek describes as New Age "obscurantists".
Wrote The Ticklish Subject (1999), explicitly positions itself against Deconstructionists, Heideggerians, Habermasians, cognitive scientists, and what Žižek describes as New Age "obscurantists".
The first thing that I remember was the prison: a crowded and noise place with people moving all around. Half of the people were guards and half were prisoners. I was neither. The prisoners all cowered from the stern abusive treatment they received from the guards. The commentary in my mind described the scene as a pool of dreaming minds: some were dreaming of power and the others were having nightmares. The center of the prison was open, and the place were I stood was on the third floor. I grabed one of the guards and threw him over the railing and he splattered on the ground. The reason I did that was I wanted to see how people would react. My behavior induced a fury of activity. Guards began running around striking the prisoners. The prisoners shrank further into the corners to avoid being hit. Nobody noticed me. I knew that they couldn't.
One of the most entertaining things to think about is this: it’s what Jeffrey Schwartz calls the causal effectiveness of volition. It is the idea that consciousness, or volition, or free will has a hand in causing the very fabric of reality to come into being. Jeffrey Schwartz, who is a neurologist, showed how volition is what wires the brain. And volition can rewire the brain at any moment. In fact, the brain is very finely attuned to volition. This idea of volition can also be thought of as will or attention or consciousness. I think all of those words just talk about the life force.
One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following diabolical device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of one hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid.What's wrong with this thought experiment? Can you guess? It's a fascinating thought experiment because it touches exactly the most important thing: reality is superposition of possibilities until someone pays attention which causes it to collapse into being. Attention gives birth to reality.
If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The first atomic decay would have poisoned it. The Psi function for the entire system would express this by having in it the living and the dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.
I picked up another book by the Dalai Lama.
I found this painting in a studio in Las Vegas. I like some of the art galleries in Las Vegas just because you can come across this type of art. This image is something akin to the way I feel. It captures something. I like it. The name of the Painting is:

Spent the evening last night with work buddies. The PM took us all out for drinks and snacks. We all chatted. I sat at a table with Marieke, Prabha, Kamal, Ishita and Ming. I talked mostly with Prabha about India and Globalization.
She moves like some Baskin Robbins dish; her long hair is like ice cream. The barriers that I remember are all still there... whispering to me all to which I'm forbidden. She seems so happy and she would love to cross the barrier that seperates us. Is this woman like Kabir? You know, can she just move in like Kabir did?